- "Mels" from "Let’s Kill Hitler"
- Angie Maitland from “Nightmare in Silver”
- Courtney Woods from “The Caretaker”
Why is it when “Doctor Who” needs a troubled (psychopathic(1), bratty(2), or disruptive(3)) and, let’s be honest “mouthy,” kid character with a major speaking part it’s always a young black girl?
Once and I was like “eh, whatever.” Twice could just be a coincidence. Three times though and you’ve got a pattern, and a pretty disturbing one here. What gives?
And don’t try pointing out that Mels is actually an early incarnation of River Song. I know that. But at this point in her story she’s presented as just a troubled kid.
FOR USE OF
ADVICE & ASSISTANCE OBTAINABLE IMMEDIATELY
HOVER TO OPEN
Let’s just appreciate the fact that Storm has BOTH Princes of Asgard crushing on her extra hard.
I can not fathom to you how annoyingly frustrated I am by Sam Peppers actions; when you dig yourself a hole and find you’re to blame, the mature thing to do is accept and own up to your actions.
Not only has this boy lied further into protecting his image and his self, he has made the situation worse by opening his mouth; he has now threatened some one who has had the courage to show the truth.
We have had numerous amounts of evidence where people have shun the light onto Sam Pepper’s true self and I find it very difficult to believe that he will find a way out of this situation.
why the hell are these tweets not covering my entire dash
Sam Peppers, so is calling Laci Green a c*nt a “social experiment” too? Or what?
how about that last gif though
Odd Romeo and Juliet Tumblr Posts
"TWO HOUSES, BOTH ALIKE, INDIGNITY"
"Street artist DS recently added a couple of paste-ups to a wall in London. It didn’t take too long before a graffiti removal guy removed the paste-ups. Shortly after that, DS was back with a paste up of the graffiti removal guy removing the graffiti."
LMFAO OMG AHAHAAHAHA
wow what the actual fuck neopets
But if you really wanna know what’s “extreme” (you don’t), I’ll have you know that it is pretty “extreme” to take a religious tradition with over 14 centuries of legal, philosophical, jurisprudential, exegetical, political, and societal thought, that has spread to just about every continent, that has come in contact with probably the majority of the world’s contemporary cultures, that has over a billion adherents in the world, that has at least five major schools of law, and that has an extraordinary capacity to be adaptable to space and time, and to reduce that tradition in its vast richness to one monolithic understanding of one arbitrary, useless issue. And while you’re at it, you can take your eurocentric understanding of what is “normal” behavior and shove it because if your primary concern with Islam is supposedly not being able to shake someone’s hand, your concern isn’t at all with the faith but with Otherizing and vilifying its adherents as ignorant followers of a religion that you, in your ignorance, have labeled as too extreme because it seemingly doesn’t conform to what you deem acceptable.